Reda El Amrani vs Mateusz Terczynski Head to Head Stats
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
W W W L W W L W L L
Form
L L W W L W L W W LHead-To-Head: Amrani 1 - 0 Terczynski
They have played 2 sets in total, with Amrani winning 2 and Terczynski winning 0. The last match between Amrani and Terczynski was at the Mestre Challenger, 20-05-2017, Q1 round, Clay with Reda El Amrani getting the victory 6-2 6-2.
| Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Reda El Amrani | 1 |
| Mateusz Terczynski | 0 |
Mestre Challenger(20-05-2017)
6
2
6
2
| Amrani | Stats | Terczynski |
|---|---|---|
| 0% (0-0) | YTD Win/Loss | 0% (0-0) |
| 1 | Head-to-Head | 0 |
| Ret. | Ranking | N/A |
| 160 | Highest Rank | N/A |
| 36 | Age | 29 |
| R | Plays | R |
| 10 | Titles | 0 |
| 61% (195-127) | Career Total W/L | 43% (114-150) |
| $20,520 | Career Prize Money | $0 |
| 1 | Clay H2H | 0 |
Today’s Tennis Tips:
Boulter VS Paolini PREDICTION Clay
Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid wta
25 Apr 2025 / Second
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
Raducanu VS Kostyuk PREDICTION Clay
Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid wta
25 Apr 2025 / Second
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
Amrani VS Terczynski H2H Matches played
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-2 6-2 |
Stats 
Reda El Amrani
Player
Mateusz Terczynski
63%
(
29 of
46)
1st Serve %
52%
(
22 of
42)
2
Aces
0
5
Double Faults
6
79%
(
23 of
29)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
14 of
22)
65%
(
11 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
6 of
20)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
26%
(
12 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
22 of
42)
56
Total Points Won
32
|
||||
Amrani VS Terczynski H2H Stats
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 0 |
| 12 | Games Won | 4 |
| 2 | Aces (Total) | 0 |
| 5 | Total Double Faults | 6 |
| 0:53:29 | Average Match Time | 0:53:29 |
| 63% (29/46) | 1st Serve % | 52% (22/42) |
| 79% (23/29) | 1st Serve Win % | 64% (14/22) |
| 65% (11/17) | 2nd Serve Win % | 30% (6/20) |
| 80% (4/5) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 0% (0/1) |
| 52% (22/42) | Return Points Win % | 26% (12/46) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (1/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (1/0) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Reda El Amrani Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Christian Lindell
Player
Reda El Amrani
70%
(
16 of
23)
1st Serve %
68%
(
23 of
34)
2
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
3
75%
(
12 of
16)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
16 of
23)
71%
(
5 of
7)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
4 of
11)
50%
(
1 of
2)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
26%
(
6 of
23)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
14 of
34)
31
Total Points Won
26
|
5-4 ret. | H2H | ||
| Q2 |
Stats
Mathias Bourgue
Player
Reda El Amrani
69%
(
75 of
109)
1st Serve %
54%
(
69 of
128)
0
Aces
10
9
Double Faults
16
64%
(
48 of
75)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
49 of
69)
47%
(
16 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
34%
(
20 of
59)
37%
(
7 of
19)
Break Points Won
36%
(
4 of
11)
41%
(
45 of
109)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
59 of
128)
123
Total Points Won
114
|
6-7(2) 6-3 7-5 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Reda El Amrani
Player
Mateusz Terczynski
63%
(
29 of
46)
1st Serve %
52%
(
22 of
42)
2
Aces
0
5
Double Faults
6
79%
(
23 of
29)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
14 of
22)
65%
(
11 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
6 of
20)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
26%
(
12 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
22 of
42)
56
Total Points Won
32
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF | 4-6 6-2 6-4 | H2H | |||
| Q2 |
Stats
Reda El Amrani
Player
Miljan Zekic
48%
(
33 of
69)
1st Serve %
58%
(
35 of
60)
3
Aces
2
9
Double Faults
3
67%
(
22 of
33)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
19 of
35)
47%
(
17 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
24%
(
6 of
25)
43%
(
6 of
14)
Break Points Won
27%
(
3 of
11)
43%
(
30 of
69)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
35 of
60)
74
Total Points Won
55
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Reda El Amrani
Player
Matthias Bachinger
55%
(
53 of
96)
1st Serve %
64%
(
64 of
100)
0
Aces
3
9
Double Faults
4
75%
(
40 of
53)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
38 of
64)
44%
(
19 of
43)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
19 of
36)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
18%
(
3 of
17)
39%
(
37 of
96)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
43 of
100)
102
Total Points Won
94
|
3-6 6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Stefano Napolitano
Player
Reda El Amrani
57%
(
24 of
42)
1st Serve %
53%
(
27 of
51)
1
Aces
3
0
Double Faults
8
88%
(
21 of
24)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
19 of
27)
61%
(
11 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
25%
(
6 of
24)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
24%
(
10 of
42)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
26 of
51)
58
Total Points Won
35
|
6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Reda El Amrani
Player
Jan Mertl
59%
(
32 of
54)
1st Serve %
47%
(
23 of
49)
2
Aces
0
5
Double Faults
6
84%
(
27 of
32)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
16 of
23)
50%
(
11 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
27%
(
7 of
26)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
6)
30%
(
16 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
26 of
49)
64
Total Points Won
39
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q2 |
Stats
Reda El Amrani
Player
Marvin Netuschil
57%
(
58 of
102)
1st Serve %
63%
(
66 of
104)
4
Aces
0
7
Double Faults
8
64%
(
37 of
58)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
38 of
66)
50%
(
22 of
44)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
14 of
38)
50%
(
8 of
16)
Break Points Won
50%
(
4 of
8)
42%
(
43 of
102)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
52 of
104)
111
Total Points Won
95
|
6-7(3) 6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Reda El Amrani
Player
Artem Smirnov
62%
(
34 of
55)
1st Serve %
67%
(
38 of
57)
4
Aces
0
5
Double Faults
3
76%
(
26 of
34)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
22 of
38)
48%
(
10 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
9 of
19)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
35%
(
19 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
26 of
57)
62
Total Points Won
50
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Mateusz Terczynski Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QF | 6-1 6-4 | H2H | |||
| Q2 | 6-4 6-1 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 6-0 6-2 | H2H | |||
| R2 |
Stats
Maciej Rajski
Player
Mateusz Terczynski
68%
(
26 of
38)
1st Serve %
63%
(
33 of
52)
1
Aces
5
0
Double Faults
1
88%
(
23 of
26)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
16 of
33)
42%
(
5 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
6 of
19)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
26%
(
10 of
38)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
30 of
52)
58
Total Points Won
32
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Mateusz Terczynski
Player
Mikolaj Lis
88%
(
36 of
41)
1st Serve %
43%
(
26 of
60)
1
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
1
86%
(
31 of
36)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
16 of
26)
60%
(
3 of
5)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
13 of
34)
31%
(
4 of
13)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
17%
(
7 of
41)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
31 of
60)
65
Total Points Won
36
|
6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Maciej Rajski
Player
Mateusz Terczynski
67%
(
58 of
86)
1st Serve %
57%
(
54 of
95)
2
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
6
72%
(
42 of
58)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
35 of
54)
64%
(
18 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
49%
(
20 of
41)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
30%
(
26 of
86)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
40 of
95)
100
Total Points Won
81
|
6-2 6-7(7) 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Mateusz Terczynski
Player
Ivan Kremenchutskyi
67%
(
46 of
69)
1st Serve %
60%
(
52 of
86)
5
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
3
72%
(
33 of
46)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
31 of
52)
39%
(
9 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
12 of
34)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
33%
(
3 of
9)
39%
(
27 of
69)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
43 of
86)
85
Total Points Won
70
|
6-3 7-5 | H2H | ||
| Q2 | 6-3 6-4 | H2H | |||
| Q2 |
Stats
Juliusz Bienkiewicz
Player
Mateusz Terczynski
42%
(
26 of
62)
1st Serve %
57%
(
41 of
72)
5
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
5
77%
(
20 of
26)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
29 of
41)
39%
(
14 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
10 of
31)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
45%
(
28 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
33 of
72)
67
Total Points Won
67
|
3-6 6-3 10-5 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Jiri Barnat
Player
Mateusz Terczynski
53%
(
58 of
109)
1st Serve %
69%
(
79 of
114)
9
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
2
62%
(
36 of
58)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
46 of
79)
53%
(
27 of
51)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
19 of
35)
46%
(
6 of
13)
Break Points Won
40%
(
4 of
10)
42%
(
46 of
109)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
49 of
114)
112
Total Points Won
111
|
6-4 6-7(2) 6-4 | H2H | ||
view more
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 61% (195/127) | Win/Loss | 43% (114/150) |
| 60% (437/294) | Sets Win/Loss | 45% (273/329) |
| 54% (3615/3020) | Games Win/Loss | 49% (2714/2820) |
| 70% (33/14) | Hard Win/Loss | 46% (42/49) |
| 60% (155/103) | Clay Win/Loss | 46% (63/74) |
| 44% (7/9) | Indoor Hard W/L | 27% (9/24) |
| 0% (0/1) | Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/3) |
| 0.11 | Aces Per Game | 0.11 |
| 356 | Aces Total | 307 |
| 0.17 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.13 |
| 561 | Total Double Faults | 348 |
| 1st Match | Average Match Time | 1st Match |
| 518.63 | Average Opponent Rank | 355.82 |
| 58% (3903/6687) | 1st Serve % | 63% (5191/8204) |
| 71% (2757/3903) | 1st Serve Win % | 63% (3290/5191) |
| 45% (1260/2784) | 2nd Serve Win % | 48% (1436/3013) |
| 44% (312/714) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 39% (257/654) |
| 41% (2767/6707) | Return Points Win % | 37% (2863/7767) |
| 14% (1/6) | Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 78% (7/2) | Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 33% (5/10) | Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 50% (52/52) | Challenger W/L | 0% (0/5) |
| 70% (130/57) | Futures W/L | 44% (114/144) |
| 63% (183/292) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 43% (112/262) |
| 64% (9/14) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 43% (29/67) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 46% (24/52) |
| 57% (49/86) | Deciding Set Win % | 36% (27/75) |
| 87% (182/159) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 79% (128/101) |
| 11% (182/20) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 21% (128/27) |
| 26% (140/37) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 9% (136/12) |
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
